Posts Tagged ‘study’

Accurately Discerning the Word

Friday, August 6th, 2010

One of the conversations had earlier this week also noted an aspect of mobility and constant access that speaks into other areas. The the subject in that part of the conversation had to do with the issue of how to verify that the things being read online are true enough to build a stable doctrinal foundation.

Thursday night, this topic came up again as some brothers were talking about 2 Timothy 2, and the impression by Paul on Timothy to not just strive for an understanding in all things (v.7), but to not let that understanding lead you into arguments over vain and profane topics (v.16). As we talked about the characteristics of a conversation what is mature, this sub-topic of exactly “how” to study to become acccurate in doctrine (v.15).

As technologists and students of the Word, it is very easy to get into “I use this application to study because it offers this and that feature.” I’d like to mature that question by asking the very pointed question:

If you have been using digital biblical study aides for an extended amount of time; what have you learned about digital resources and the content offered which enables you to discern those things profitable from those things heretical?

This is a tough question for some, because the challenge isn’t just to say “I know because the Spirit told me so.” The burden of proof is on how you take whatever topic or area of Scripture you are studying and how this relates to the previously held and disputed contentions about that item over the course of Judeao-Christian history. Ideally, the “how you discern” comes from such attention. I’d like to know what that looks like, based on usage of digital resources and the experiences within ministry you’ve had.

And if you’ve not quite figured out the “how” just yet, but looking to do so, comment towards what exactly you are having trouble with, or what specific challenges you might be having relating the availability of information, the expanse of it, and then that undertaking of reading the right things.

Looking forward to your comments on this one.

 

Digital Crutches

Monday, June 14th, 2010

This past week in attending a Bible study, there was a handout given. When the handout was given I remarked, “why was Google Docs not used?” Do understand that all those who attend that bible study would have already given their emails to the group leader, and so it would just be a matter of sharing a document – or even building a form that all could work on and save within their unique profiles.

But, in doing so, I opened the can of worms that is sometimes perceived as a digital crutch. If you will being enough wrapped into the tool to get something done (remember a verse, recall notes, parse text, etc.) that when its removed that the user is essentially paralyzed.

A recent post on the Logos blog took a look at the idea of a digital crutch from the perspective of learning Greek and Hebrew. As anyone who has studied and learned a foreign (to them) language, you have to have more than a head knowledge of the language, but be associated enough with its contexts that you can correctly speak and apply the language and contextual concepts portrayed with it. Just being able to repeat an address, or being so dependent on an electronic index doesn’t help, but makes you appear to not respect the context for a form of association that isn’t always received as genuine.

Such is the issue that we have dealt with in all media since oral/auditory learning took a back seat to various types of media. And this isn’t completely a bad thing, media has done much to engage the cognitive abilities of people that traditional forms of oral/auditory learning just couldn’t jog just by itself. That being said, the key to learning has always been to associate as closely with the content as possible.

Bible applications are important in light of this. Not everyone has someone who is learned in languages, histories, etc. of Scripture that they can simply sit under them and gain enough to become a teacher to others (i.e., disciple). And yet, even with these applications, we run the risk of making them a crutch if all we do is rely on the search algorithms and database methodologies of the people who created this software. It vitally important that we embed into our beings the literal Scripture, and even contextual facts, so that to the best of God’s ability to work through us, we are not just giving people words, but embracing them with life.

So let this admonition to get in your text encourage you to not just read your Bible, study deeper into a passage, or even learn something new via your mobile/digital devices. But take the time to embed the word into your heart, mind, and soul so that you can speak forth wisdom that sounds like a concordance, but comes from the intimacy of time that you spent with the Author of the Text.

 

CCM: Exciting Times for Digital Bible Study

Thursday, February 18th, 2010

Great article over at Christian Computing Magazine (CCM) talking about Digital Bible Studying and how its evolved with now a near-digital/mobile-native approach that’s able to be taken towards Bible studying. Here’s a snippet:

…It is truly a great time to be a student of God’s word. If you use a computer, smart phone, or book reader, then you have more tools available for studying the Word of God then at any time in history. And I think the best thing this does for us is not cut the time it takes to do our studying, but rather it helps us go much deeper. If your primary goal for doing Bible study on any of these platforms is to cut minutes or hours off your time in the Word, then you are missing the greatest benefit. Instead your goal should be to go deeper in the same amount of time…

Read of the rest of Digital Bible Study Is Breaking the Banks of the Personal Computer at Christian Computing Magazine (CCM).

In terms of a comment from MMM’s perspective, I’ll repeat a question that was stated in a post a few weeks ago:

So what does it mean to have believers who have instant access to multiple resource and communities, who seek answers to the questions of faith and life, evaluating sources in real-time through online and offline relationships, instead of waiting for a sermon or preacher to smooth the message.

If you will, we’ve got the ease in getting to the resource now. So what does the Body do in terms of teaching those analytical and spatial-search skills that will enable believers and non-believers alike to engage the Bible, and the people of the Bible, in God-edifying ways? Yes, these are indeed exciting times, but the implications of being able to do digital Bible studies means that we’ve also got to tweak our methods of teaching and living with one another. Are we up for the challenge, because, its for these implications that these times are exciting too.

 

Choosing Bible Software in Light of Use

Wednesday, December 23rd, 2009

I’m probably a lot less of an authority on the subject of choosing Bible software these days moreso than in times past because of the increasing (good) quality of offerings, and the very different paradigms of use that I’ve had. Where I’m very mobile, others might not be as much when it comes to choosing Bible software for.

Image: torn book pages, via Future Perfect Publishing

I can only imagine what kind of difficulty that biblical schools can have here. On one side, you want to minimize support issues by using one or very few variations in software. But, much like choosing which Bible versions to read, you really want to teach people how to evaluate all so they can come to an educated opinion. There aren’t courses for choosing the right bible software though, so what are schools to do?

After reading Karyn’s views on the subject (at Boulders 2 Bits), I’m more convinced that there needs to be better data models with Bible software so that content and features can be easily shared between Bible softawre platforms. And I mean more than just the same Bible formats for the Bibles themselves, but similar usage flows for things like creating search filters, parsing languages, etc. If the companies can come together in this, then the idea of choosing the right Bible software moves more towards the effectiveness of the brand to give the best experience, not necessarly proprietory features. Because we don’t think about how to click links and save bookmarks when we use different web browsers, why should things be so different with Bible software that we have to choose (and get stuck after so long in one system or another).

When you choose your Bible software platform, think not just about what you can do now with it, but what things look like if you were to decide later that the platform no longer suits your needs.