Posts Tagged ‘reading’

Text, Tech, and Understanding

Friday, August 13th, 2010

Thursday nights are spent with a group of brothers with food, conversation, and a Bible study. One of the more interesting things coming up lately has been the use of smartphones (and an iPad) during that study. There’s been some cross-pollonating of tech understanding in the midst of that. We’ve talked about Bible versions, Bible applications, and even understanding the right times to pull out print/phone versus conversing from the heart. It has been really decent to see.

The challenge is crafting an understanding of the text without being dependent on the tech. And I think that even with print we have an issue in doing this. So, I wonder, before injecting MMM’s stance on things, do we place too much of a value on the resources, and being able to find the answer via the resources, versus knowing the text in our heart, where the resources supply only the accessory evidence?

 

Late to eReading or Just Looking at the Covers Still

Wednesday, August 11th, 2010

Some months ago, I made a post about why it wasn’t such a good idea to invest in ebooks. The thinking was – and still is – that investing in ebooks with unresolved questions such as being able to read books across devices, the long-term viability of certain ebooks, and even the various containers that encourage or prohibit ebook reading makes for a tumutilous time if you are wondering if its a good time to go ebook or not.

And the truth is, I am not sure if it is a good time yet. Yet, today, I took the plunge by purchasing my first Kindle book on my iPad. And for the type of reading that this is, I think I can see where ebooks do have a profitable, and actually advanteageous niche.

The book that I purchased is titled Abusing Scripture: the Consequences of Misreading the Bible and is basically an academic, theological, and sociological look at different abuses to handling Scripture that have occured within evangeltical (and to some extent, all) Christian circles. This is a book ripe with footnotes and endnotes and is the kind of read that not only takes time, but is one where I’ve on several times texted friends encouraging them to either purchase the book or to share a quote.

With a print book, this is a simple matter. You see something you like and either type it verbatium or take a picture of a piece of the passage and then share it via MMS or email. There’s nothing illegal about doing this (it falls within fair use for snippets, not entire books). To my friends, they probably have a bit too much information coming their way, and probably would like a better way to triage it.

I had gotten about 90 pages through the paperback when I realized that I didn’t want to pick up or carry the paperback again. It wasn’t that it wasn’t portable enough, nor that it wasn’t intimate enough. I just knew that in the midst of reading that I’d want to do more than highlight or bookmark. I wanted to dig a bit deeper, and here’s where simple paper failed me. For a person that has grown up in increasingly informational times, there are those reads that are just great (immersive) reads, and those reads like this one where it adds considerable value to the reading experience to be able to cross-reference and dig a bit deeper.

So, I pulled out my iPad, downloaded the Kindle app, and purchased Abusing Scripture in less than 5min. It took me a while to find where I left off, as the page numbers for the ebook didn’t equate to the paperback, but once I did, I was just as comfortable reading on the iPad as I had been the paper. A person watching me read (the iPad was on a table in front of me) even asked how I liked the Kindle. Though letting her know that it was just the kindle app for the iPad, it was still readily apparent that I was reading differently and at the same time little changed.

It is a bit of a two-edged sword to go this route. I’ve spent weeks looking at the various ebook formats and ebook stores. I’m even considering selling the iPad for the latest Kindle (seriously). Because of this, I made some choice value judgements: what ebook companies will be around for the forseeable future; what kind of content will I stick to purchasing in print versus digital; what are potential hurdles; and a number of other questions. I really wanted to make sure before I went with any ebook solution that I was choosing right.

But, the choice became easier as I looked at the types of books that I read and those which I am likely to want to recall for reference, versus pass on as library material. For one, books like Abusing Scripture are great books to co-read with another person. It doesn’t make for a good gift-book because of the type of content and the conversations around it. That being said, after reading it, I’d want to reference it for other readings or writings.

Another aspect to ebooks that works in their favor are in those perodicals that I’d like to read. I’m a huge fan still of magazines and much of my time in bookstores is spent in the magazine section looking at covers, trends, and just glazing content (and offline web browsing experience if you will). I’d like to have a similar experience on the iPad (Kindle, iBooks, or any other reader), but be able to choose those more immersive reading apps like Wired or Popular Science if the content dictates. Ebooks are perfect for such a format.

Where ebooks fall down for me is in those more story-like readings. For example, I have the book Boundaries. I really dig that book, but its one of many that the stories presented always adds the kind of layers to conversations where pulling out the book just makes more sense. Those kinds of books are also the kind where you don’t feel so bad letting someone borrow them. The Nook has a great solution here electronically, would be nice to see other books jump at such a method.

Bibles (and their notes) are different. While I do have a Bible app on my iPad, I’m not yet sure of the right Bible format for larger screened mobile devices. On one hand, having a reading experience that’s similar to a paper bible works, but its an ebook, I’d really like to see something more revlutionary take place because the content is so interconnected. Then also there’s the notes, highlighting, bookmarking aspect of reading the Bible. I’m still not yet pleased with solutions there – but some interesting stuff is happening in this space that’s worth waiting for.

All of this being said, yes, there’s now a book on my iPad. And for the kind of book that it is, having it in an electronic manner makes sense. At some point, perhaps in the near future, perhaps in 5 years or so, this won’t be a decision that needs to be made. It may very well be that the point of paper books will be for those very quality, treasured works to where there is a point in retaining them in that manner. For everything else, having access to it, no matter the device you are reading from, makes more sense. There will need to be some considerable innovations on the side of licensing and formatting, but it will come.

Until then, make careful decisions on what goes ebook and what doesn’t. And then read for longevity where possible. If it is something that will become a box of books that will eventually be recycled (not donated), then ebook just might be the better call.

 

Digital Crutches

Monday, June 14th, 2010

This past week in attending a Bible study, there was a handout given. When the handout was given I remarked, “why was Google Docs not used?” Do understand that all those who attend that bible study would have already given their emails to the group leader, and so it would just be a matter of sharing a document – or even building a form that all could work on and save within their unique profiles.

But, in doing so, I opened the can of worms that is sometimes perceived as a digital crutch. If you will being enough wrapped into the tool to get something done (remember a verse, recall notes, parse text, etc.) that when its removed that the user is essentially paralyzed.

A recent post on the Logos blog took a look at the idea of a digital crutch from the perspective of learning Greek and Hebrew. As anyone who has studied and learned a foreign (to them) language, you have to have more than a head knowledge of the language, but be associated enough with its contexts that you can correctly speak and apply the language and contextual concepts portrayed with it. Just being able to repeat an address, or being so dependent on an electronic index doesn’t help, but makes you appear to not respect the context for a form of association that isn’t always received as genuine.

Such is the issue that we have dealt with in all media since oral/auditory learning took a back seat to various types of media. And this isn’t completely a bad thing, media has done much to engage the cognitive abilities of people that traditional forms of oral/auditory learning just couldn’t jog just by itself. That being said, the key to learning has always been to associate as closely with the content as possible.

Bible applications are important in light of this. Not everyone has someone who is learned in languages, histories, etc. of Scripture that they can simply sit under them and gain enough to become a teacher to others (i.e., disciple). And yet, even with these applications, we run the risk of making them a crutch if all we do is rely on the search algorithms and database methodologies of the people who created this software. It vitally important that we embed into our beings the literal Scripture, and even contextual facts, so that to the best of God’s ability to work through us, we are not just giving people words, but embracing them with life.

So let this admonition to get in your text encourage you to not just read your Bible, study deeper into a passage, or even learn something new via your mobile/digital devices. But take the time to embed the word into your heart, mind, and soul so that you can speak forth wisdom that sounds like a concordance, but comes from the intimacy of time that you spent with the Author of the Text.

 

Mag+ and Contextual Electronic Reading

Sunday, January 10th, 2010

I know that MMM harps a lot about ebooks, electronic Bibles and such, but there’s really a good reason for doing so – there’s no innovation there. At the intersection of faith and mobile tech, at the very least, a Bible reader should be enabling the story and history of Christianity to be better engaged. But, we just haven’t seen too many folks push enough. So, here’s a little bump called Mag+:

Mag+ from Bonnier on Vimeo.

Forget what is or isn’t possible, watch it and think about how you read – and interact – with the Bible on a contextual basis. Does your Bible reader offer this level of engagement? And if not, shouldn’t we help them get to this level of simplicity?

 

Face the Book (v1)

Sunday, November 29th, 2009

This past Saturday, I kept up with the Bible Software Shootout as many who were in attendance were tweeting about the happenings. One thing I can say about whatever that was happening there, it looks like a lot of the major software developers really got the point that the user interface of a Bible application means nothing if people cannot simplyget in the Book.

This attetion to user interface design is totally a by produt of the impact that the iPhone has made on the entire computing industry. That’s not to say that many software products and services don’t suffer through feature-itis. Many do and will continue to. But, it is to say that there are some areas where people are getting it, and one of them just happens to be within the realm of mobile bible software.

So let me ask you this simple question: when you are ready to read a verse/passage in your Bible, how many steps does it take between you thinking about it and you getting there? How many steps after you’ve gotten to that verse/passage does it take for you to do the next thing (meditate, journal/bookmark, send it to a friend, etc.)? Its these kinds of questions that software developers think about often when they are developing the software that you like. And you know something, there are a lot of answers that they come up with. The simplest one though is always the hardest to pull off – keeping your eyes in the text.

This is something that paper books have a lock on. Its easy, you read, highlight, pull another book from the side to make a note, but the text is still there. No matter where you go, you must face the book in order to engage the text. The user interface is that simple.

And so here’s my challenge and exortation to those who were at that challenge, and those who are developing other software Bible solutions: What can you do with your product to keep a person’s eyes in the text of Scripture while still offering the featurs that enable you to differentitate from your competitors? Because if you can do that, then it won’t matter what version(s) you offer, or even the cost of your product. People will be drawn to the text – and therefore to engaging with God. Drawing people to Him, will bring in the sales and solutions you seek.