I hear enough times, from certain generations/economic classes/ethnicities, that the idea of “community” that has some grounding in “electronic connectivity” is somehow less genuine and less effective than other methods. Of course, these comments tend to come from people groups where there’s been at least a few generations where the social stream has been disconnected from the family/village narrative, so I can understand why that perception lies so.
In this age of information and connected-ness, can one afford to not connect via the methods of the age/class/culture? Sure, we can make choices about some streams (I know I do when it comes to FB, Google+, etc.) – but we’d be missing the conversation of the age if we didn’t connect with it right? Here’s something to that point said in a recent Harvard Business Review piece:
…As the kind of connectedness that social media and technologies like Skype facilitate crosses and blurs the boundaries between social and professional networks, the depth of the relationships that result is often profound. For me, the insight is more important than the size of the input: a light-hearted quip is often more helpful and insightful than a long post or link to a book, or more often now, an eBook. It is about sharing ideas, developing them together, and putting them jointly to good use — this depth increases with the degree of connectedness you have, and in turn sustains it over time.
The most interesting part of social media is how it enables more meaningful connections with friends, colleagues, and advisers. Connectedness in this sense is also about the seamless way in which our communication continues, irrespective of whether we are meeting over a cup of tea or meeting over Skype, sending each other direct messages on Twitter or writing on each others’ Facebook walls, or sharing links and holding conversations in LinkedIn or Google Plus…
Read the rest of What It Means to Be Connected at the Harvard Business Review blog.
While you are considering how you will broadcast your/our faith to todays generations and generations to come, are you also subscribing to the understanding and wisdom present in the behaviors of connections taking place?


.jpg)
A few recent conversations have me thinking a good bit about age and multiple languages, and how mobile addresses but also adds questions.




Stop Waiting for the Right Time
Monday, February 21st, 2011What stuck out (besides the writing) was the quote noted at the end of the Fortune article:
Due to his situation with NBC, he had to react differently. Taking the route that he was used to wasn’t an option – that is, if he wanted to continue doing what he is doing.
Can the church afford to not be similar? Can any religious group?
Yes, there’s a notable difference in the way that some leaders interact with tech and the way their communities interact with it (not digital immigrant versus native, a different kind of divide that’s not fully understood or researched). It is a matter of shift – the kind of shift that happens every few generations that drastically alters how we continue living.
I won’t yet take the position that the digital transformations happening endear themselves to larger changes happening to faith cultures (there is a parallel happening) – but I will say that its no longer a time to sit on any sideline and say that you won’t engage. We have to be cognisant of the levels of relationship the Spirit encourages (Acts 1:8) without letting passions for one type overrun the rest (tweet).
And so we are challenged. Not just to become digitally savy, but to refine how we interact with one another in light of church/faith character no longer being “broadcast the message and wait for the results.” Similar to how Conan and others have found with performing, we need to understand that ministering also means engaging.
Engaging is beyond just making a website, establishing just another broadcast channel, and simulating interactivity with SMS and Facebook. It is becoming an active participant within the lives of people who do and don’t make a distinction between virtual relationships and offline ones. Its becoming a voice mediating the struggles people have when their contexts, and brokering the gaps with the same passion that is usually reserved for “being political” to maintain a presence. Its being instead of posturing. All with the results of an infusinon of faith on a level that is altogether familiar, and altogether bent towards the paradigm of life that people live now.
So what are you waiting for? Or rather, what has your faith community stopped waiting for from you and decided to find in another space?
Tags: community, Conan O'Brien, innovation, media, paradigm, Twitter
Posted in Commentary, Social Engagement | No Comments »