This should probably turn into a segment in our Future Trends series (Publishing, Software, Hardware), but I’ve got to do a bit more digging before making some more definitive positioning statements. One thing is for sure, there are some trends in regards to data formats that I see a bit clearer after doing some updates to our Mobile Bibles page, and it could end up being a win-win for a lot of folks – especially users.
A Short History of Files
Years ago, I got involved with the Palm Bible+ project as the webmaster and a user. As one of the few free Bible applications (at that time), Bible+ used to get all kinds of requests for Bibles in various languages. This was usually easy to do with a bit of programming on the part of the user, but you usually ended up with a Bible that would only work with that application.
In a similar fashion, there was the eSword application and Bibles created for it. This application were also free to distribute and worked across several desktop PC platforms. In the years since initially running into the eSword project, there’s been several updates to the file format, including the use of the STEP format, and the creating of a Windows Mobile client to also read these texts.
On the other side of the Bible+ project was the move to DRM texts. The original developer of the Palm Bible Reader made steps to create a version of the Bible reader that would accept copyrighted texts. The Bible+ project grew out of this, yet it was clear at this point that there would need to be two methods for handling Biblical text/media.
The Dollar Items
Of course, not everything can be for free, and as we’ve chatted about here several times, the issue of Bible formatting is a sensitive one for those publishers and developers involved.
There is a clear line though towards Bible formats and what becomes needed to be paid for. For example, there has always been numerous versions of the Bible available for free – but, it had not been until recently (past three years) that you’d be able to find some of the more modern translations available for free. These were (rightly) tied to an application, and coded to work specifically with that body of text.
This works well when you are talking about the audience of readers whom are invested into reading the text – those people who are new to the faith, or who only see the Bible for a casual reading/reference work will place a different value to it, and therefore look at the cost of it to them differently.
Not everything can be free, and not everything will fly off the shelves priced too far away. There’s got to be some kind of answer to this issue, and maybe it is near the actual formats that are used in various Bible applications.
What I Noticed
When looking at the Mobile Bibles page, I noticed a few things. The Bible+ Project was originally just for one platform, and the Bibles created for it can now be read in PalmOS Classic, Symbian, BlackBerry OS, and Maemo/MeeGo. Bibles made for the eSword environment also are supported on several platforms (Windows/Mac/Linux, Maemo, Maemo/MeeGo, and some previous Windows Mobile devices).
And that’s the free stuff. When you get to the paid Bibles, there’s compatiability for everything from Java-based handsets, to iOS (iPad, iPhone), Android, Symbian, and BlackBerry mobile devices.
A newer approach is being taken on by Logos, with the Biblia API project. Here, its not so much the actual reading environment that is being pressed, but you are given content, and have the ability (through license agreement) to use that content in a manner that works best for you. So here, you are using both new and old texts, free and paid texts, in a connected space, over a browser, or a customized (for the platform) application. So far, other companies aren’t going this route, but I do postulate that this would be the eventual end of much of the content that we deal with Biblically when consistent connectivity (QoS) isn’t in question.
In effect, everything is covered by two approaches to Bible formats:
- Leveraging the existing content, older translations, and multi-lingual needs created for platforms that still have a large user base, but the users may have moved to newer devices and don’t want to purchase their initial downloaded investments
- Utilizing proprietary formats which are advantageous for newer translations, free and purchase systems, and leverage the exposed connectivity features of newer mobile platforms and/or wireless access levels of users
I think that we still need to get to a point of seeing one commonly used Bible format, with the sharing, purchasing, etc. components handled by device/user tokens. And we might get there. Looking at just what is available now, and how the needs of those looking for Bibles are being addressed, it looks like we might essentially get there – but with users needing to pay as much attention to the reading platform, as much as they do the text itself.
At least that’s what it looks like on our Mobile Bibles page. I’ll probably tweak this page even more later when more of these associations are noticed. Besides making it easier for you to find a reader, it might help you make better decisions about how to manage your digital Biblical assets before the next major change hits several more software/development companies in this space.
And to think, I’m not even touching (yet) audio Bibles 
I was recently invited on a bicycle ride with another brother in the faith and while we only went 10 miles, it was great to have some fellowship and just chat while putting the feet to the pedals. One of the statements that the brother made is that he wishes that there were more believers around him who liked to bike, as he would love to do this as a fellowship activity. I mentioned to him about some groups of believers that I know who do ride, but there were no in his area. It got me thinking, is there a more effective way to combine an activity like bicycling (or hiking, running, etc.) with fellowship?
Today, I attended a tweet-chat (think: text-based conference call held on Twitter) that 
Upgrading My Wife (Her Phone That Is)
Wednesday, December 1st, 2010When we switched to T-Mobile back in 2007, I started off with the T-Mobile Dash (Windows Mobile phone with QWERTY keyboard), but my wife opted for a simple flip phone. After upgrading to the Google G1 in 2009, my wife inherited my Dash (without a data plan). Why did she get the Dash? Well, she was starting to do a lot more texting and saw the benefits and speed of having a full keyboard, so she gladly took my old phone. That was the beginning of upgrading my wife.
Fast forward to earlier this year (2010), and the Dash finally started to show its age by dropping calls & no longer keeping a charge for a good part of the day. With that, my wife started asking me to get her a new phone. The only requirement that she gave me was that it had to have a QWERTY keyboard because she had become accustomed to it & really liked it, although she said she might consider a device with an on-screen keyboard (ala the iPhone & the like). Seeing that we were still on T-Mobile & her wanting a QWERTY, that guaranteed that it was a smartphone, but didn’t leave very much wiggle room outside of a Blackberry or Nokia device, or maybe an Android. I personally liked the idea of a Nokia because I couldn’t bear the thought of my wife having a “better” phone than me (LOL).
Over Thanksgiving weekend, we both got our wish. Having followed the Windows Phone 7 since it was announced, I’d received many emails concerning their phones, including an email that I’d received earlier in the week that I could get the HTC HD7 in a buy 1 get 1 free offer. I also knew they had the Samsung Vibrant (Android) for the same deal (and price), so that was an option too. The only downside to both of these phones is that neither had the physical QWERTY that my wife wanted. Either way, I promised her a new phone and thought the HD7 would fit the bill, so we headed out to the local T-Mobile store in Detroit, where we were for the holiday. To our surprise, they had about 6 or 7 smartphones that they were selling with the buy 1 get 1 free offer, including the Google G2, which I had personally been coveting since I first heard about it.
Even though I wasn’t up for a new phone until next month per our contract (December 26), the representative was nice enough to call customer service, who gave the okay to give me the discount/upgrade a month early; which we needed to do the buy 1 get 1 free deal without adding a new line. So, now my wife & I are both happy. She has her new phone, and I have a new phone too, and the one I really wanted all along.
The nice thing now is that it’s giving me an opportunity to teach my wife a new operating system (Android), and how to use her phone to the best of its abilities. I’ve already shown her how to setup her Facebook account, and all the basics of the phone, including giving her a custom made ringtone. Over the next few weeks I plan on showing her the in’s & out’s so that she’s a proficient Android user.
Tags: Android, education, G2, HD7, HTC, spouse, T-Mobile, upgrading, Windows Phone 7
Posted in Commentary, Devices and Software | No Comments »