I am having a hard time titling this post. Mainly because it is a public writ of some personal thoughts that I have had for some time.
I have been on the road since Tuesday of last week. Between a new laptop and my Treo (and mainly the Treo), I have been able to stay up to date with various news and notes from around the web and with people around me. Because of the accessiblity I have with this tech, I was able to reconnnect with a lot of people in the DC, Annapolis, and Phila. areas. From phone calls to text messages, it sure seemed that for all the mobile that I was doing by driving, that my tech was doing a lot of the same, just stretching the ability to connect a bit further than I was driving.
This morning, I got into Charlotte after driving the entire night from Philly and went straight to church. I am one of the persons who helps to set up for service and this was my week to be there early. After we finished setting up, I pulled out my laptop to email one of the guys some notes from my trip that I had taken. Another member stopped me and began asking questions about mobile tech (that I use) and RSS. He expressed at one point that he felt he was being a bother, but he wasn't. I was happy to share what I know with him. It was there that it hit me (again): does mobile ministry really matter if the things that I take as being simple are not yet understood by the many.
In the conversation I had
with Mobile Cowboy this past week, we talked about really getting out there and
challenging the way that churches respond and use tech. And we both have a great idea as to how to do it. The question stopped at the "how and where's the relevance" end of things. Sure, we are passionate about it, but without sounding geeky, how do we translate this appropriate use of technology into something that can viably be called
a ministry.I am thinking about this past week and what I was able to do personally, but how little of it had relevance to anyone else until I was able to sit down with them. Mobile tech is shaped like that; its personal by design and has to have personal relevance before it can become even a blip on the radar. I've been at this blog/magazine
for sometime now and feel like I fall short in encouraging/teaching where tech becomes a personal enough matter to enable the right kinds of change when it intersects with our fatih.
Now,
this is the right kind of change. Its the kind of effect that I wish that MMM had/has (changing a paradigm of use, as well as galvanizing communities whom otherwise would be left out of those things tech). I am not sure that it does, and therefore I question its relevance and effectiveness. Sure,
expressing God's heart for tech and and
innovations of what is here is great, but to date, I just haven't been able to turn that corner to where all those things typed get practiced
more often than sometimes.
I hope that by
going to BibleTech 2008 that I'd find what I am looking for in terms of that further kick, motivation, or something. I just don't know if mobile ministry will be relevant enough as a pursuant in my own life for me to take the best advantage of it. Unless a personal connection is made with the people who would most benefit by it, mobile ministry is more talk than action, and in effect missing the point of doing all things to the glory of God.
Labels: BibleTech, mission, mobile, tech