I live in Kansas, where technology isn’t at the speed of light like the rest of the world. In the rural part where I am, until October there was only one local provider with old phone models and old phone plans. October 1, AT&T came into the rural parts of the Midwest bringing with it better choices of technology and better phone plans. However, people are resistant. AT&T should be very careful here, play their hand right because Midwest people are not like rough New York people used to the hustle and bustle of sales and deals. This is a place of slower moving people, business and while I see it changing, here are some things that can make the transition better.
First, AT&T bought out a local company which was a CDMA-based cellular provider – AT&T is a GSM carrier. While that means something to me and probably to the reader, it means very little to 90% of the population here. People in my town have been used to buying the simple phone, having it for 2 years on contract and then switching. The concept of putting a SIM card in a different phone every week or every day is foreign and mostly unnecessary to many of the people here.
Because of the move to a different cellular technology, AT&T is forcing upgrades on phones and plans for people who are/were happy with the phones they currently have. Granted, there’s a technical reason why they cannot keep their old phones, but changing their plans by force is not the way to keep customers.
I believe GSM is the way to go, who should be locked into one phone for one year, two years or however long the provider wants? This should not be the main concern with this target of customers. As with any change of service, people are looking for AT&T not just to keep their service on, but to woo them towards something better that they may offer. Locals are used to Unicel and 10 years of service and support – that’s a long time in business relationship terms – and so change has to come with some kind of incentive for existing customers.
The thing that AT&T is doing right is bringing the newer phones into rural Midwest. I finally have been able to attain an iPhone and be able to have service out here. Yay! There is a catch. I don’t have 3G yet. I believe it is coming. Having a national GSM company out here is first priority, then 3G will follow. And not to sound like an Apple fan girl, AT&T is bringing Android 2.2 out here as well, which is great also because there will not just be a better network, but more choices for mobile devices which people can use on it.
As with many places, I’ve noticed there is a younger set of population in rural America that wants new technology, and has been craving it – yet availability and education towards newer technologies has been lacking. I have been bringing in my handsets for three years now and asked constantly, “what is that?” In many respects, I have been an evangelist of Nokia, Apple, and HTC smartphones for three years in a place that hasn’t seen anything like them. Now that a national carrier will sell them here, there’s a chance that a better understanding how these phones can help improve business practices and personal lives can take root.
Which takes me to back to my first point – while we are a slower moving part of the US, once we understand how something can improve our lives, we take it and run with it. I see the rural parts of Midwest coming into technology quickly – as long as AT&T doesn’t alienate the core customer base that it obtained. What I’d like to see AT&T do for their base customers, and for new customers is this: help rural America see how much a smart phone can help smooth out daily operations of lives. My father still has business cards from 1975 of people who are no longer in business, but the family has remained in contact. How can that be idea transferred to mobile? My smart phone can hold thousands of contacts, even if I never use them, with a search function by name so I don’t have to scroll for hours trying to find Sally Mae’s phone number. That is useful to people. Even if they don’t use the numbers often, they want to know that they can, and a phone that can only hold 100 hundred numbers is limiting. Touting a phone that can be a phone book, calendar, and hold pictures is something new to people here. It seems arbitrary to some city people, I know. I’ve had phones that have done that for at least 5 years. Yet this is a new way of life coming out to Midwest America and having people use it in a way that enhances life will be a fun transition to watch, and if handled correctly, will change lives for the better all around.
Come back next week when I discuss the ways the new technology coming in will affect business practices, church functions and community events.
Editor Note: Mobility in the Midwest is a weekly series that will be looking at some of the mobile technology challenges presented in the Midwest US, and what the transition to mobile and connected communications means towards these communities.
Hopefully, you are aware and have been paying attention to the sessions and active conversations surrounding the 
The Homework of Visionaries and Ministers (Part 2)
Friday, October 29th, 2010Continued from Part 1
These views (The Internet Services Disruption and Dawn of a New Day) of technology then take us back to this understanding – or growing body of knowledge – to what mobile ministry is and how it fits in this conversation of visionaries and ministers. Mobile ministry is a genre of a genre. And in many respects its a term that means something to those who still see computing as a noun rather than a verb. For its brief history, mobile ministry has been characterized by the communication media (7th mass media) and the application/layer of the Gospel message on top of that media in order to further evangelize and disciple others into an understanding of the Christian faith.
It can and should be seen differently. Mobile as a technology presumes personal connections, micro-interactions, macro-infrastructure concerns, and an interconnectivity that will soon pull another mass media to the forefront. Mobile as a ministry should therefore pursue those personal connections, chance interactions, and mass elemental/environmental effects which cause us to meet at the result of the Gospel’s implication – John 17:20-26.
And so I go back to that MMM Mobile Experiment and those lessons learned, those lessons that weren’t technological, but spiritual. Where was the application of the Gospel? There was innovation, but where was that innovation centered on the relevant approaches to community advancement which spoke towards characteristics we are familiar with in the history of the faith? It wasn’t there, and for that viewpoint, mobile ministry took a backseat to a vision that while great, just wasn’t framed right.
The homework of a visionary is then quite clear – where is the framing for the vision? Is it based in the reality of what is needed right now? Certainly, this is the case for many of us whom are involved in approaches to ministry and media where there are practical needs such as shoe-string budgets for multimedia-needs/wants. There are those who are in missional fields where the needs are to serve or record certain types of content, but there is no understanding of the cultural dos and don’ts towards what should and should not be transmitted, even if we are talking about the experience of the Gospel.
And then there’s that homework that’s based on what will be needed? What are the impending implications of the various economic and environmental issues which will mean that we have to be better educated/equipped to handle multiple streams of thought (resources, languages, core utilities, etc.). How does the visionary teach “go forward” when the resource says “make best with the bread you have today.” In other words, you have to be both disruptive and directive at the same time – and do so while crafting an understanding around what is understood and what is accepted about those things digital and those things traditionally assumed as spiritual (analog).
To the minister/ministry who is taking a look at the digital landscape and wondering what’s next, your assignment is nearly as simple as Paul’s statement in Romans 12:2 – with the context of going digital (active, participant) from digital/analog (passive, responsive, reactant) in our response to the needs of the culture ability to hear the Gospel that we present. It is more than just having the understanding of the silo of mobile or web, it is taking our approach from nouns to verbs. When computing becomes a verb, we start looking at how it connects and adds relevant value to our lives. In the same view, mobile ministry as a verb looks and acts a lot different than just adding a mobile phone or snippet content to an effort. Yes, this is part of it, and certainly such formatting of hardware, software, and services breaks down the ability to change the applied tense of the word we are using. Yet it is a step beyond – and that step takes a change to how we behave towards the history of ministry.
The Christian living in today’s context sees no difference between online and offline – computing is a verb. It is either engaging their abilities to touch the world with the Spirit of God, or hindering their ability to see clearly the Body in motion they heard about which provoked their faith at the start. And while the context of how someone gets digital might be different, mobile shows us that the disruption that is come to technology and culture is meant to bring the kind of light to all people – at least to all people that can be served digitally, we need to walk to the rest – the kind of light which is going to be a fundamental change to them because as the object of the Spirit, the tech will point.
Also published via Google Docs for comments/discussion
Tags: discipliship, MMM Mobile Web Experiment, mobility, social networking, social web, spirituality, The Homework of Visionaries and Ministers, trends, web
Posted in Commentary, Devices and Software, Future Trends | View Comments