Archive for July, 2010

What Matters When Choosing A Mobile

Tuesday, July 13th, 2010

Par the course for speaking about and advertising about MMM, the question of “what’s the best smartphone” always comes up. And while we have talked about this in times past, its really important to emphasize that device capability and cost have to end up at solution that speaks well towards using mobile technology as part of your spiritual toolkit.

So then, what matters the most? This all depends on several factors:

  • What do you plan to do
  • What are your cost constraints
  • Do you have travel concerns
  • What kind of media (audio, video, etc.) will you be using with the device
  • Are you purchasing for yourself, for a family, for an organization? Who managages the governance around that use

Usually speaking, mobile devices are pretty simple and largely will do all of the same basic (and slightly advanced) things. All can go online, all can usea variety of applications, and all break if dropped a particular way.

If you are a developer, and looking at mobile device platforms to get an idea of how to push an application, then you are best served not by looking at global or slightly regional trends, but looking at your current audience, and looking at the comparative trends between them and the larger mobile population (check out the research being conducted at the Pew Internet & American Life Project).

If you are a content provider, then your view on mobile platforms needs to not just include understanding the trends, but understanding the technical (and financial) infrastructure towards those people you are intending your content to reach. A lot of times, this means that going the route of application development isn’t the best long-term method, and that you might need more than one content delivery mechanism.

For example, when looking at a personal mobile device, I am usually looking for a platform that doesn’t require me to relearn the wheel in terms of how it works, doesn’t ask a lot of me in terms of managing applications (because of system resources or lack of applications casuing me to make a signifiant investment in apps), and can fade into the background as an organizer while remaining powerful enough to be a mobile computer when I need something more than a phone.

The conclusion usually ends up with saying that given sufficient research, and asking yourself the right questions (what fits need rather than want), you can usually end up with a device that you are not just happy with, but it also will grow with you until your capabilities endear you to looking for another device.

For reflection/discussion:
What are some of the aspects of your current mobile device that will factor into your next device? What are things you wish you would have considered before making the purchase?

 

Developing Wisdom Towards Mobile Applications

Monday, July 12th, 2010

It can be well argued that in the early stages of MMM that there was the position of “if its mobile, then its an answer for ‘X’.” Over the years, its been good to mature from that point of view, yet still hold onto the focus that there are indeed benefits to communication, engagement, and sharing the Gospel with mobile technology as an agent. Recent conversations have helped this maturing perspective, though there’s a good bit more work that’s needed.

My mother used to quote to me Proverbs 4:7 to me quite often (wisdom is the principle thing; therefore get wisdom; and with all thy getting get understanding). As it relates to the use of mobile technology within faith-based initatives, there’s a good bit of direction that such a verse gives. There’s the acquistion of knowledge with which to build wisdom and understanding. There’s the experiential factor of success and failure for various implementations of that knowledge (which leads to understanding). And then there’s an ability to reteach and relearn concepts related to that initial knowledge acquisition, but do so with a somewhat clearer lens than times previous.

The difficult thing is that aspect though to get wisdom. Wisdom isn’t so much that you can get by attending a class, finding a resource guide, or even experimenting. Wisdom comes after all of those, plus the greying of time and focus, to see what is the implication of decisions made towards and with digital technologies in lieu of the presented contexts (or environments).

For example, knowledge can tell us that to increased access to technology doesn’t guarantee increased educational advancement. Wisdom takes that study and asks about the methods employed, investigates the people and contextual concerns, and then in as unbiased a manner as possible, analyizes the proposed and realized positive and negative implications of that technology adoption attempt. Wisdom is careful to attempt this again, but with full understanding of what happens when certain variables are taken/not-taken into consideration. Or, wisdom doesn’t attempt this again, until certain other measures are employed.

This becomes one of the challenges to MMM on the side of training and consulting. Much of what we want to espouse has to do with developing the best or most ideal environments to understand and wisely apply mobile and social-web technologies. This cannot be done where zeal and temperance overburden the level of knowledge that’s present (if you will, the “let’s do it because they are doing it too” mentality). Much has to be done to develop avenues of knowledge building (on our end that’s case studies, resource guide/reports, and speaking engagements) so that there’s suitable understanding on tap to develop wisdom by.

At some point in the (near-ish) future, there will be ample information here and other places onlline and offline that the inital steps towards building understanding and wisdom won’t need as much tilling. At that point, developing solutions for mobile ministry engagement will be less a question of experimentation, and more one of “go and seek those who have already travelled this road.” Until then, this site, like a few others, will serve to learn and disseminate approaches to, and lessons from, the implications of the use of mobile technology in ministry contexts. Then, with those lessons garnered, we will detail the stories of what works and what doesn’t work – with the expectation that those searching for wisdom will not only find it, but become co-laborers in telling this story of what’s possible.

 

Content, Collaboration, and Mobile Ministry Case Studies

Tuesday, July 6th, 2010

MMM has been going on for over 5 years. In that time, the point of the posted content was simply to be available. Mobile was too young and there were too many unanswerable questions for content to serve a purpose any more than that. Having been in this position for a while, and several others having stepped up in various aspects towards creating content, what needs to happen at MMM is a lot different than where it traditionally has been.

There are seven (7) content categories at here at MMM:

  • Mobile web trends
  • SMS/MMS Engagement Strategies
  • Mobiles in Education
  • Languages/Language Resource Development
  • Future Tech and Impacts
  • Devices, Software, and User Interfaces
  • Accessibility and Access

It is within these areas that MMM’s content is now designed around. As a general rule, I’m posing on one (1) of these items and doing so once a day – to ensure that it generates the kind of discussion and reflection befitting a magazine (moreso than just a blog).

All of these areas are fit for the submission of resource materials and the development of content/best practices which would fit the need for those persons looking for resources or examples of execution.

Therefore, the process of submitting/publishing of content is as follows:

  • Person contact’s MMM (via contact form or Twitter) that they have a content idea; discussions around the idea take place (whether it fits MMM’s model or not)
  • If accepted, the person shares (via Google Docs, Google Wave, or similar) or emails the content so that it can be reviewed and edited (if needed)
  • Content is placed in the publishing queue and the submitter is notified when this item posts to the Mobile Ministry Case Studies page
  • If this item is a downloadable – the use of document sharing entities such as SlideShare or Scribd are recommended.
  • If this item is an analyst report, the user and MMM can opt to negotiate making this item a paid (PayPal) downloadable (details on this to come later and will be detailed on the consulting and training services page
  • Marketing of the content is shared between MMM and the content submitter

In this way, the content sees a healthy set of eyes before it is published, and also there’s accountability throughout the process, ensuring that these items are published.

It may be the case that you have the data, but not the time to create the report. For this, negotiating with MMM the best way to create and publish the content is advised as this is a paid service.

Please know that I’d really like to get more voices and content on MMM. For 5 years it really has been mainly my voice. And while God has blessed me with a lot of writing and perspective over the years, there’s no way that I can capture or spark the discussion towards everything that’s happening. Given that MMM is in my hands in a longer-term mode, I owe it to the Body to be available, and use what He’s given me to bless your efforts.

So if this works not just in terms of building content, but making something of strategic value for you or your missional agents/clients, let’s chat. Thanks for your time, and your prayers. Let’s engage folks with a mobile lens and give em Christ :)