Archive for May, 2010

Myths and Misconceptions of Mobile

Friday, May 28th, 2010

One of the (longer) readings that has come from the mobile blogsphere has been a piece called Everything You Wanted to Ask About Mobile But Were Afraid To Ask by Tomi Ahonen (Communities Dominate Brands, Mobile as 7th of the Mass Media, etc.). This piece is an excellent primer towards mobile from a high (and probably nearly mid-)level perspective, and yet is about the right kind of perspective that’s needed for such a field. Here’s a snippet of that piece:

…And do remember, that is global numbers. Two thirds of the planet means we now cover people who are refugees from wars, living in poverty etc. On the planet there are 800 million people of reading age who are illiterate, 1.6 billion people live beyond the reach of electricity, and 900 million are children under the age of 7. There are more people with mobile phones than have access to running water. More mobile phone subscribers on the planet than use a toothbrush (its true!). Yet even across all these hardships, the mobile has spread so rapidly that there was a mobile phone for two thirds of the planet at the start of this year, and will be 75% of planet Earth’s population by the end of this year…

It is no longer an issue of whether mobile is here, now it’s time to address our perceptions and possibilities because it is.

Update: Read more about MMM’s coverage of SMS in mobile.

 

The Changing State of Devices and User Interfaces

Tuesday, May 25th, 2010

It’s a good time to give a small update towards a recently purchased iPad, and also what I feel is something that I think we miss in respect to the many devices and user interfaces that we have to deal with.

First, iPad Thoughts
Let me just say off the top that I like the iPad not because of applications or screen size, but because the battery life is absolutely amazing. My impressions really begin and end with the fact that the device can last all day (in a coffeehouse setting). And for my uses, I’m just using the web browser. Tons of windows open at a time mind you – and an occasional blog posting such as this one – but really, its Wi-Fi all the time. Amazing really.

Lot’s of questions have come from folks asking if it has a USB port. And then I ask them why it needs one. Usually the answer is “to put files on there.” Then I ask them, what kind of files and the conversations get silent. We’ve become used to managing files on portable media, but not really understanding of why we do that (obvious answer: because you need a non-online ability to read or edit something). Thing is, for many of these folks, these are files (documents, multimedia, etc.) which they usually access next to an Internet connection. So why not use something like email, or fancier like GDocs instead? For them, its a different way of thinking and acting, but one to consider with the iPad.

Which Leads to User Interfaces
User interfaces – or UIs – are interesting. On many computers, because we are used to the keyboard and mouse methodology, we are accustomed to controls and behaviors that take advantage of these items. For example, we look for keyboard shortcuts just about everytime we have a keyboard. With the iPad, that line of thinking needs to go out of the window – even mores than some other mobile devices which have touch screens.

The iPad doesn’t make any concessions to ways of interacting with content/media that act as if they first need a mouse and/or keyboard. Everything is designed with the idea of touch and go. And its actually to the point that there are some actions that could use a gesture or better touch-style control, but those don’t exist – such as managing browser windows. The device, and its software, don’t rely on former methods in order to make the point that you can interact with content. It’s designed so that you don’t have to assume much of anything.

Hence this really interesting paradigm of use and behavior that develops with the iPad and similar-sized devices. You have this device that’s the size of a book, that’s simpler than many books, and that allows you to forget that there’s a such thing as a power supply nearby – and you simply just use it. If not careful, the simplicity of the UI and the functionality around it takes what was previously a chore in terms of engaging content, and makes it into “the way it always was.”

When designing for a touch-based UI, this is the kind of thinking that needs to be cultivated into function. The fact that we physically touch digital planes means that we can (and sometimes do) ascribe a deeper sensory connection to it. It’s not just a Bible reader, but I’m touching and manipulating the very lines that make up the Bible so that I better understand it. This is similar to the student who has a pack of highlighters and the resultant multi-color textbooks. The colors and actions of highlighting allows for a kind of interaction with the content that makes it easier to recall and reuse the content. In the same way, touching allows for a newer (or older, depending on your perspective), relationship to content.

When a site is well designed for the size and ability of modern-day touchscreen devices, its not just another site – it becomes another type of experience. If done really well, and then control mechanisms are contextual, you don’t miss the former methods at all, but do wonder why it took so long for things to get this simple.

In relation to the iPad, this is how using it makes me feel. I look forward to digging into the various unique applications that have been designed for this platform – and don’t just want to display content, but want to present ways of engaging it that are deeper, wider, and altogether more engrossing than other types of media. With mobile, mobile w/touch, this is very much the bar to be reached, and the bar to be explored.

 

Interview with In the Light Ministries Philly Tonite

Friday, May 21st, 2010

Just a heads that MMM’s founder, Antoine RJ Wright, will be interviewed tonight by In the Light Ministries Philly. Information about how you can tune in will be posted via Twitter (@mobileminmag). The call will be at 7pm EST (GMT-4). Sorry for the short notice as this was just setup a few minutes ago. Would love to hear your feedback.

For more info about the ministry doing the interview, visit the In the Light Ministries Philly website.

 

The Language of Access

Thursday, May 20th, 2010

If there’s anything that new technology/devices can teach you quickly is that there’s a language to access that some people have, and others don’t. And maybe it has some to do with specific regions – as it definitely has something to do with the logos/brands placed on devices – because some languages are better understood than others.

For example, you can say to someone that you have an iPad, and the language that’s heard sounds like ‘affluence,” “American,” “arrogant,” or whatever comes to your mind when you see that apple logo. Or even terms like access, internet, social networking, and smartphone. These terms have some shape within our minds, and then as we learn more about the terms, the people and actions associated with them, and even their impacts, we begin to form some language towards those items that may or may not be so clear to others.

Those people who are IT-minded tend to know this very well. There’s a language that (depending on where in IT you sit), is either geeky, nerdy, or just flat out weird. When engaging people who don’t have that background, it can be a challenge for some to remove themselves from their “native tongue” to something more accessible to the listening audience. However, this is an endeavor that we should take on – for how does the Body get edified if the sound is harsh or foreign and not easily understood in its context.

That’s the challenge for mobile – as a genre of technology and culture. As a phenomena that has literally wrapped itself around every area of the world that reads and speaks, mobile has itself created this language of use and function that is sometimes easy to understand (applications, ringtones, costs, etc.) and other times is jumbled gibberish (APIs, plaforms, standards, policies, etc.). For those of us who are in mobile, its our challenge to make these areas intelligible to others who are apt to teach so that mobile doesn’t become stigmatized and that it can reach realms beyond just those who can attain it.

Many of the largest mobile companies (manufacturers, carriers, etc.) have been looking at how to drive mobile penetration rates higher. At this point, almost everyone who wants to own a mobile has one. The problem is reaching those who might want one, but have some non-addressed need. For example, they cannot read, therefore how would they operate the device. Or, they have an harder time with screen, input, or other service elements that would require substantial redesigns of devices and service layers. These companies have correctly identified that if mobile were to grow (in profit and influence) for their benefit, that they have to address these concerns.

In the same way, the Body (Christian faith communities) have to ask the question of not just mobile, but all tech – are we speaking a language that is easily understood by all. Or, are we subjecting the message to just the subset of people who have access to it? If we are doing this, how then do we exercise the fulfilling of Jesus’ prayer in John 17:20-26?

 

Comparison Thoughts on the iPad and Bible Study Apps

Monday, May 17th, 2010

If there’s anything that we know about here at MMM, its this idea of using mobile tech to increase one’s ability to understand and share Scripture. This has led to many thoughts here and other places on the topic, some better than others. Over at Bible Software Newsletter, this topic is revisited with the iPad taking the focus and some approaches taken with software. Here’s a snippet:

…I downloaded the free app and then downloaded several free resources and purchased the concise 3 library and the NIV with study notes. Pros: For now this is my go to app while in church. It is easy to use and easy to get around in. I wish I could test the original language resources and strong’s numbering, but I already have access to those in other programs and could not justify the cost. I think this is where Olive Tree separates themselves from the others. They actually went head to head against Mac and PC programs at SBL! Olive tree also has the most options for background and text colors and lots of free resources. Cons: only 1 additional window and I would like to click on a word and look it up a dictionary…

Read the rest of this review.

One thing seems really obvious; its not the content, but the user interface that determines the appeal on a tablet platform. Should provide some interesting lessons to be applied over time.